Miles Guo Court Documents · Doc 557

摘要

Nonparty Motion · To Compel the Prosecution to Disclose Known Victims

A one-page motion dated April 3, 2025, submitted by a nonparty identifying as Chunk Chyi "as an interested party in the case," titled "Motion to Compel Prosecution to Disclose Known Victims" and invoking the Due Process Clauses of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments.

What the filer asks

The motion asks the Court to compel the prosecution to disclose the victims it has identified. In earlier letters the same filer had repeatedly stated that they are not a victim in this case; the concern expressed is the scope and verifiability of the victim set the prosecution asserts.

Where this filing sits on the docket — recorded alongside

This filing is one of the six improper filings enumerated in the Court's order of April 4, 2025 (Dkt. 596). That order recites that by order dated April 3, 2025 (Dkt. 528) the Court had explained the limited circumstances in which a nonparty may file in a criminal case; had explained why the specific filings by Chunk Chyi and Bei Bei Zhu were improper and, in some instances, could be construed as threatening, harassing, or at a minimum vexatious; and had warned that further improper filings could lead to a permanent filing injunction — and that within twenty-four hours of that order being docketed, the two filed six additional improper filings, this one among them (Dkts. 553–57, 582). The Court found them vexatious nonparties who had abused the public's right of access and imposed a pre-filing screening requirement.

Note

Under the rule stated in the April 3 order, a nonparty has only two routes in this case: a third-party petition under 21 U.S.C. § 853(n), or a motion under the Crime Victims' Rights Act, which applies only to persons "directly and proximately harmed." The filer's repeated disclaimer of victim status sits in tension with asserting rights under the CVRA — and that was one of the grounds on which the Court found the filings improper.