Miles Guo Court Documents · Doc 794
The appeals court denies Ranyue Bai’s mandamus petition but allows him to renew it later if the district court does not act in a reasonable time.
摘要
Second Circuit Order · Denying Ranyue Bai Mandamus Petition
This two-page document is the Second Circuit's order in In re: Ranyue Bai, Case No. 25-2726, denying the pro se mandamus petition. The order was issued by a panel sitting at the Thurgood Marshall U.S. Courthouse, 40 Foley Square, in the City of New York, on the 26th day of November, 2025, and transmitted to the SDNY docket on January 22, 2026.
Panel
The panel consisted of:
- Dennis Jacobs, Circuit Judge;
- Joseph F. Bianco, Circuit Judge;
- Victor A. Bolden, District Judge (sitting by designation).
Petitioner's Requests
Ranyue Bai, pro se, filed a petition for a writ of mandamus directing the district court to:
- Cease suppressing his future filings;
- Docket his submitted but undocketed motions;
- Rule on his pending Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(d)(3) motion.
Disposition
Applying Cheney v. U.S. Dist. Ct. for D.C., 542 U.S. 367, 380–81 (2004), the panel denies the mandamus petition because:
- Petitioner has not demonstrated that his right to the writ is clear and indisputable;
- Petitioner has not demonstrated that granting the writ is appropriate under the circumstances.
In view of the large number of submissions received by the district court, which the panel "trust[s] the court will address expeditiously," the docketing-related portion of the mandamus petition is denied without prejudice to renewal if the district court fails to docket the submissions within a reasonable time.