Miles Guo Court Documents · Doc 824
法庭文件 · 2026-03-24 · 2 页 · United States District Court · S.D.N.Y.
sentencing deadline extension requestgovernment letterRule 17(c) coordination100-page defense submissionApril 7 proposed deadlinethree-week review window
The government asks the court to extend its sentencing submission deadline to April 7, 2026, to respond to the defendant’s lengthy filing and upcoming supplemental materials.
摘要
Government Letter · Request to Extend Sentencing Submission Deadline
This two-page letter, dated March 24, 2026 from the Assistant U.S. Attorneys assigned to the case (under the authority of Sean S. Buckley), asks Judge Analisa Torres to extend the government's deadline for its sentencing submission in United States v. Miles Guo, S3 23 Cr. 118 (AT).
Existing Deadline and Requested Date
- The government's submission is currently due March 27, 2026.
- The government requests the deadline be extended to April 7, 2026 — the same date by which Mr. Guo's supplemental submission (using materials obtained under the Rule 17(c) subpoena) is then due.
Reasons Cited
Three reasons supporting the extension:
- Volume of the defense submission: On March 20, 2026 — following numerous adjournments requested by the defendant — the defense filed a sentencing submission in excess of 100 pages (case-doc-822);
- Pending supplemental materials: On March 23, 2026 (case-doc-823), the Court granted Mr. Guo's Rule 17(c) subpoena request and directed that the defense supplement its sentencing submission with subpoena-derived materials by April 3, 2026;
- Efficient briefing: Coordinating the government's submission with the defense's supplemental materials would limit the number of filings the Court must consider and enable more efficient analysis in advance of the then-scheduled April 27, 2026 sentencing hearing.
Schedule Impact
Under the proposed timeline, the Court would still have approximately three weeks between the April 7 submission date and the April 27 sentencing date to review both parties' positions. The defense had not objected to the extension at the time of filing.
查看原始文档 ↗