Summary
Summary being generated…
Document not found.
Summary being generated…
法庭文件 · 2026-05-06 · 218 页 · United States District Court · S.D.N.Y.
The defense cross-examines witness Le Zhou to show that he voluntarily supported and benefited from the G enterprises, actively helped the movement, and knowingly opened accounts and companies to process about $2 million in follower funds.
This 218-page document is the official trial transcript of United States v. Miles Guo, 23 Cr. 118 (AT), for the proceedings of May 29, 2024, beginning at 9:00 a.m. before District Judge Analisa Torres and a jury. The transcript was filed on May 6, 2026.
The day opened (jury not present) with a ruling by Judge Torres on the government's motion to admit certain exhibits consisting of preserved copies of online posts to G News and Gettr (ECF No. 352, with defense opposition at ECF No. 361). Citing Anderson v. United States, 417 U.S. 211 (1974), the Court agreed with the government that the posts are not hearsay because they are offered "for the fact that they exist, i.e., that they were made on media websites created and controlled by the defendant," rather than for the truth of the matters asserted.
The remainder of the session was cross-examination of government witness Le Zhou, a longtime UK London Farm volunteer.
Le Zhou testified that he actively supported and benefited from the G enterprises, volunteering for the movement. He confirmed that his motivation was to "help the followers," with his help directed at the UK London Farm leader's request to help followers, without specification of whether the followers were from the UK London Club or other farms.
Le Zhou acknowledged:
Le Zhou testified that:
Le Zhou first opened the bank accounts to receive money for the UK London Farm in 2021. He documented incoming funds; outgoing funds were strictly per the instructions he received. He did not receive instructions to wire money to Mr. Guo personally.
Le Zhou also confirmed his participation in volunteer work, including:
This transcript covers the third week of the eight-week trial. The cross-examination of Le Zhou is part of the defense's case theory that follower-volunteers like Mr. Zhou were knowing participants in a political movement rather than victims of fraud — a theme that recurs in the later sentencing-phase litigation (case-docs-822, 833, 835, 843).